Draftv0.1Joint procurement + sustainability shed scorer
The supply shedis the formal GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Guidance (LSRG) term for the region serving a known first-collection point or processing facility. When per-supplier traceability is impossible (common in beef sourcing), Scope 3 inventories report at the shed level. Nestlé and Tyson are jointly defining a shed where the cattle Tyson processes for Nestlé's beef products simultaneously meet a multi-criteria threshold:
- Tyson wants: high predicted carcass yield + grade per head (margin), reliable supply volume, short haul
- Nestlé wants: low methane intensity per kg beef, high regen-ag practice density, deforestation-free, MRV-defensible
- Both want: after the November 2025 collapse of Tyson's "Climate Smart Beef" program (EWG settlement), parcel-level evidence-grounded claims they can both defend
Same Earth Layer substrate as the existing agents. This lens composes:
| Metric | Who cares | Source signal | Build state (at inception) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted shed margin per head | Tyson procurement | cattle-agent carcass-model over shed cohorts | substrate ready |
| Methane intensity per kg beef | Nestlé Scope 3 | carbon-agent enteric pathway + cattle-agent intake | substrate ready |
| Soil carbon stock + sequestration potential | Nestlé insetting | carbon-agent + SSURGO organic matter | substrate ready |
| Regen-ag practice density | Both (joint claim) | irrigation + ecological-site condition + operator self-claim portal | needs new lens math |
| Drought / water resilience | Both (supply reliability) | water-agent + RAP forage outlook | needs roadmap signal |
| MRV maturity (% CERES-tagged operators) | Nestlé audit defensibility | CERES Tag adoption per parcel | needs roadmap signal |
| Deforestation-free attestation | Both (EUDR + brand) | CDL forest-loss time series within shed boundary | needs roadmap signal |
| Supply volume sufficiency | Tyson procurement | head-count estimate from CERES + parcel-level stocking | needs new lens math |
| Composite shed score | Joint | weighted blend with adjustable sliders per stakeholder | needs new lens math |
- Input: a Tyson processing facility location + Nestlé's threshold requirements (regen-ag %, deforestation-free, head-count target, max-haul radius)
- Materialize the candidate shed: every TX/OK/NM parcel within the radius, by CDL + ownership + soil + water + CERES presence
- Run the 9 metrics in the scorecard above, per-parcel and rolled up to shed level
- Render a shed map colored by composite score, with two-stakeholder sliders (Tyson margin emphasis ↔ Nestlé Scope 3 emphasis)
- "Compare alternative sheds" · Amarillo vs Hereford vs Dalhart, which boundary scores best
- Export an audit-grade evidence packet (the shed equivalent of the diligence memo)
The /enterprise/pilots/procurement page answers a SINGLE-stakeholder question (Tyson procurement: should I take this bid?). The supply-shed scorer answers a TWO-stakeholder question (Nestlé sustainability + Tyson procurement, jointly: which geographic boundary do we both want to source from this contract year?). Different audience, different decision moment, different commercial cycle, same substrate. Building it as a separate lens keeps each surface focused.